Sigma 30mm F1.4 Dc

Sigma 30mm F1.4 Dc

. Too bad I didn't come across your test sooner, but I did end up getting the Sigma and so far I love it! That is indeed good news to hear.
DC Lenses for Digital SLR Camera10-20mm F4-5. Jojo _ your test results are pretty much in line with Photozone between these to lens.
Thanks for all your posts on dpreview and site here with advice to send to sigma instead of playing lens roulette- got there in the end! KRob, my (Sigma-adjusted) 30f1.

Distortion control and light falloff go in favor to the Canon (again, similarly to the 35L). 00 21 days with insurance: $69. This lens will NOT work for full frame cameras such as the 5D. 4 (wide open) does not have any haze to it, is sharper at f1.
8, and contrast is very high on the Sigma, though stopping down of course helps too.

The Canon 28 is a fine lens, and smaller too, but if you're looking for all-out optical quality, it doesn't get any better than the 30 f1. 7") minimum focusing distance to infinity, this lens creates very sharp images with high contrast.

CA is also a poor spot for the Canon, and bokeh is more pleasing with the EX.

is there any reason why one should holland anti racism shirt get the canon over the sigma (aside from being able to use it on FF and the possible risk of having to re-chip for newer bodies)? I was having the hardest time choosing between these two lenses only a couple of days ago.
Despite my difficulty believing your statements about the Sigma AF (no offense meant), you have given me cause to consider trying another copy. Given that the EX is priced around the $400 mark, comes with hood and pouch, delivers superior optics (though make sure focusing is accurate), and is an "f1. Richie Ed, for crop bodies, the EX is cost city in louisiana map of living comparrison the one to get.

" I tried a Sigma 30, and my copy did muhammad ka roza mp3 not front or back focus. 4- this copy is simply brilliant.
I would certainly consider it for a FF body myself if the FOV was to my liking. Given a properly-functioning copy of the EX, it really is an amazing optic through and through.
So my comments in this test still stand vis-a-vis AF performance of the Sigma. 4 The most appropriate coating for digital SLR cameras Two SLD (Special Low Dispersion) glass elements and an hybrid aspherical lens, provides the utmost correction for all types of aberrations Equipped with HSM (Hyper Sonic Motor) system This large aperture standard lens was exclusively designed for digital SLR cameras featuring APS-C size image sensor Sigma Corporation is pleased mcp and pip joints to announce the launch of the new 30mm F1. The build is good (a small version of the 85f1. 8 now that I hadn't had earlier.

4" lens, it remains the APS-C standard prime of choice. . I have full confidence shooting it at f1. 00 (return shipping included) A cult favorite for 1. 8), performance is a bit better than its 35f2 sibling, its AF (with ring USM and FTM) is swift and silent and smooth, and ergonomically, it's a very small and light package that will work on both APS-C and FF. Both lenses are clearly excellent in the centre by f/2.

The EX is at its highest lady polo shirt t resolution and contrast numbers at f5. That said, I have an appreciation for the 28f1.

00 Two weeks with insurance: $52. 4 EX DC HSM Photo Gallery by lightrules at pbase. Prior to calibration, it was unreliable, but post-calibration, it's very accurate.

Its border performance is slightly inferior to the 35L, but overall, it's strengths outweigh any bad things about alcohol weaknesses. If I have read your reviews correctly, the Sigma 30mm f1. but sometimes it can be way-off (random front or back focussing from shot to shot on radio call sign lookup the same subject, usually in lower light levels).

Hi Lightrules, Amin, Just picked up another sigma 30 1. 4 EX DC HSM One week with insurance: $36.
As to focusing, I had no problems with either during testing; both were "bang on" in the AF department. * The angle of view depends upon the digital camera being. In terms of flare, the Canon really takes a hit; the EX performs at an extremely high level (see the 30EX v 35L flare test too) while the Canon 28 performs similarly to its 35L sibling not very well. 2 that would help people think about this lens as my copy really improves here.

Mine gets a lot of use! Hi Lightrules, After being at Sigma UK for 4 weeks, I finally got my new 30 1. Very popular for indoor shooting in low light conditions. 4 B&H Pricing $430 Comes with hood and pouch GENERAL COMMENTS: After having only recently completed my test between the Sigma 30EX and Canon 35L (see ), I was looking forward to seeing how the Canon 28f1. Thanks for taking the time to do all these tests.

In terms of image quality per se, the EX is the stronger performer. 6, while the Canon reaches its peak around f8. It focused fine, so I don't think it was a bad copy in that respect (most "bad" copies supposedly frontfocus); however, in low light it did not AF in the same class as the Canon, which got way more keepers.

I am also impressed by the fact that you think the Sigma 150mm f2.

I've been eying a fast fixed focal lens for low light indoors stuff, 30mm or under as the 50's aren't wide enough for my liking. 8 and found that the same types of subjects infact challenge both lenses/cameras- just that the sigma for some reason is usually out by somewhat bigger margins (at the same aperture of course).